Cases
65
This is not an official Supreme Court website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LLC. All rights reserved.
This is not an official Supreme Court website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LLC. All rights reserved.
Term
Term pages work like a public dashboard for the Court: grants, arguments, and decisions all tied to the same annual cycle.
Term dashboard
65 cases, 36 opinions, 50 arguments.
63 grants and 20 decisions are currently attached to this term.
Cases
65
Granted
63
Decided
20
Opinions
36
Arguments
50
Recent opinions
Dissent
Kaley Chiles v. Patty Salazar, in Her Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, et al.
By Ketanji Brown Jackson · Mar 31, 2026
Concurrence
Kaley Chiles v. Patty Salazar, in Her Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, et al.
By Elena Kagan · Mar 31, 2026
Opinion of the Court
Kaley Chiles v. Patty Salazar, in Her Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, et al.
By Neil M. Gorsuch · Mar 31, 2026
Dissent
Isabel Rico v. United States
By Samuel A. Alito, Jr. · Mar 25, 2026
Opinion of the Court
Isabel Rico v. United States
By Neil M. Gorsuch · Mar 25, 2026
Concurrence
Cox Communications, Inc., et al. v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.
By Sonia Sotomayor · Mar 25, 2026
Opinion of the Court
Cox Communications, Inc., et al. v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.
By Clarence Thomas · Mar 25, 2026
Opinion of the Court
Gabriel Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi
By Elena Kagan · Mar 20, 2026
Opinion of the Court
Cedric Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corporation
By Sonia Sotomayor · Mar 4, 2026
Opinion of the Court
Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, et al. v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General
By Ketanji Brown Jackson · Mar 4, 2026
Opinion of the Court
The GEO Group, Inc. v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.
By Elena Kagan · Feb 25, 2026
Opinion of the Court
David Asa Villarreal v. Texas
By Ketanji Brown Jackson · Feb 25, 2026
Concurrence
David Asa Villarreal v. Texas
By Clarence Thomas · Feb 25, 2026
Concurrence
David Asa Villarreal v. Texas
By Samuel A. Alito, Jr. · Feb 25, 2026
Opinion of the Court
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., et al. v. Sarah Palmquist, Individually and as Next Friend of E.P., a Minor, et al.
By Sonia Sotomayor · Feb 24, 2026
Opinion of the Court
United States Postal Service, et al. v. Lebene Konan
By Clarence Thomas · Feb 24, 2026
Opinion of the Court
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., et al.
By John G. Roberts, Jr. · Feb 20, 2026
Dissent
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., et al.
By Brett M. Kavanaugh · Feb 20, 2026
Dissent
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., et al.
By Clarence Thomas · Feb 20, 2026
Concurrence in part
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., et al.
By Ketanji Brown Jackson · Feb 20, 2026
Concurrence in part
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., et al.
By Elena Kagan · Feb 20, 2026
Opinion of the Court
Learning Resources, Inc., et al. v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.
By John G. Roberts, Jr. · Feb 20, 2026
Opinion of the Court
Harold R. Berk v. Wilson C. Choy, et al.
By Amy Coney Barrett · Jan 20, 2026
Concurrence
Holsey Ellingburg, Jr. v. United States
By Clarence Thomas · Jan 20, 2026
Oral arguments
April Session
Apr 1, 2026
Argued. For petitioners: D. John Sauer, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Cecillia D. Wang, San Francisco, Cal.
March Session
Mar 31, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Joseph J. Perkovich, New York, N. Y. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondents: Scott G. Stewart, Solicitor General, Jackson, Miss.; and Emily M. Ferguson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
March Session
Mar 30, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Tobias S. Loss-Eaton, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
March Session
Mar 30, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Adam G. Unikowsky, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex.
March Session
Mar 25, 2026
Argued. For petitioners: Traci L. Lovitt, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Jennifer D. Bennett, San Francisco, Cal.
March Session
Mar 24, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Gregory G. Garre, Washington, D. C.; and Frederick Liu, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: William M. Jay, Washington, D. C.
Cases
24-539
Kaley Chiles v. Patty Salazar, in Her Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, et al.
Kaley Chiles is a licensed counselor who helps people by talking with them. A practicing Christian, Chiles believes that people flourish when they live consistently with God's design, including their biological sex. Many of her clients seek her counsel precisely because they believe that their faith and their relati...
24-171
Cox Communications, Inc., et al. v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.
Did the Fourth Circuit err in holding that a service provider can be held liable for "materially contributing" to copyright infringement merely because it knew that people were using certain accounts to infringe and did not terminate access, without proof that the service provider affirmatively fostered infringement...
24-1056
Isabel Rico v. United States
Whether the fugitive-tolling doctrine applies in the context of supervised release.
24-993
March Session
Mar 24, 2026
Argued. For petitioners: Vivek Suri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Kelsi B. Corkran, Washington, D. C.
March Session
Mar 23, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Scott G. Stewart, Solicitor General, Jackson, Miss. For respondents: Paul D. Clement, Alexandria, Va.; and D. John Sauer, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
March Session
Mar 4, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Alexandria, Va. For respondents: Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal.; and Sopan Joshi, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
March Session
Mar 3, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Lisa S. Blatt, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Zoe A. Jacoby, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
March Session
Mar 2, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Sarah M. Harris, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Erin E. Murphy, Alexandria, Va.
February Session
Feb 25, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Philip L. Ellison, Hemlock, Mich. For United States, as amicus curiae: Frederick Liu, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Matthew T. Nelson, Grand Rapids, Mich.
February Session
Feb 24, 2026
Argued. For petitioners: John J. Bursch, Caledonia, Mich. For respondent: Ann M. Sherman, Solicitor General, Lansing, Mich.
February Session
Feb 23, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Richard D. Klingler, Washington, D. C.; and Aimee Brown, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Paul D. Clement, Alexandria, Va.
February Session
Feb 23, 2026
Argued. For petitioner: Morgan L. Ratner, Washington, D. C.; and Curtis E. Gannon, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Jules L. Lobel, Pittsburgh, Pa.
January Session
Jan 21, 2026
Argued. For applicants: D. John Sauer, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Paul D. Clement, Alexandria, Va.
Gabriel Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi
Whether, as the Fifth Circuit holds in conflict with the Ninth and Tenth Circuits, this Court's decision in Heck v. Humphrey bars § 1983 claims seeking purely prospective relief where the plaintiff has been punished before under the law challenged as unconstitutional. 2. Whether, as the Fifth Circuit and at least fo...
24-1021
Cedric Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corporation
Whether the New Jersey Transit Corporation is entitled to interstate sovereign immunity under the Federal Constitution, as held by the highest court of Pennsylvania in square conflict with the highest court of New York. THE PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF CERTIORARI ARE GRANTED, LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHETHER THE...
24-1113
New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. v. Jeffrey Colt, et al.
States are entitled to sovereign immunity from private suits in other States' courts, including state-created entities that function as "arms of the State." Petitioner New Jersey Transit (NJ Transit), a state-created entity, was named as a defendant in a private suit in New York. The New York Court of Appeals relied...
24-777
Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, et al. v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides that noncitizens on American soil are generally eligible for asylum if they qualify as a "refugee." 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1) (A). A refugee is someone with "a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social...
24-758
The GEO Group, Inc. v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, the courts of appeals "have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts." This Court has held that certain orders are immediately appealable under Section 1291 even though they do not terminate the litigation. Such "collateral orders" include orders denying claims...
24-557
David Asa Villarreal v. Texas
Whether a trial court abridges the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel by prohibiting the defendant and his counsel from discussing the defendant's testimony during an overnight recess.
24-724
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., et al. v. Sarah Palmquist, Individually and as Next Friend of E.P., a Minor, et al.
Whether a district court's final judgment as to completely diverse parties must be vacated when an appellate court later determines that it erred by dismissing a non-diverse party at the time of removal. 2. Whether a plaintiff may defeat diversity jurisdiction after removal by amending the complaint to add factual a...
24-351
United States Postal Service, et al. v. Lebene Konan
The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), ch. 753, 60 Stat. 842 (28 U.S.C. 1346(b), 2671 et seq.), generally waives the United States' sovereign immunity for suits seeking damages "for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission" of an employee of the federal...
24-1287
Learning Resources, Inc., et al. v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. ("IEEPA") permits the President, upon a valid emergency declaration, to "investigate, block during the pendency of an investigation, regulate, direct and compel, nullify, void, prevent or prohibit, any acquisition, holding, withholding, use, t...
25-250
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., et al.
Whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Pub. L. No. 95-223, Tit. II, 91 Stat. 1626, authorizes the tariffs imposed by President Trump pursuant to the national emergencies declared or continued in Proclamation 10,886 and Executive Orders 14,157, 14,193, 14,194, 14,195, and 14,257, as amended....
24-808
Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Jeanne Ann Burton, Chapter 7 Trustee for Vista-Pro Automotive, LLC
Well-settled legal principles dictate that a judgment entered in the absence of personal jurisdiction is void. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) authorizes federal courts to vacate a judgment when it is void. A motion seeking vacatur, however, "must be made within a reasonable time." Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1)....
24-482
Holsey Ellingburg, Jr. v. United States
Whether criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) is penal for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause. JOHN F. BASH, ESQUIRE, OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, IS INVITED TO BRIEF AND ARGUE THIS CASE, AS AMICUS CURIAE, IN SUPPORT OF THE JUDGMENT BELOW.
24-440
Harold R. Berk v. Wilson C. Choy, et al.
This case presents a clear, recognized, entrenched conflict over an important question about the application of state procedural rules in federal court. Delaware, like numerous states, requires that in certain actions the plaintiff must also file an affidavit of merit ("AOM") with the complaint. See 18 Del. C. § 685...
24-624
William Trevor Case v. Montana
Whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.
24-568
Michael J. Bost, et al. v. Illinois State Board of Elections, et al.
Federal law sets the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November as the federal Election Day. 2 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 7; and 3 U.S.C. § 1. Several states, including Illinois, have enacted state laws that allow ballots to be received and counted after Election Day. Petitioners contend these state laws are preempted un...
24-5774
Dwayne Barrett v. United States
Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause permits two sentences for an act that violates 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and§ 924(j), a question that divides seven circuits but about which the Solicitor General and Petitioner agree. II. Whether "Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under §924(c) (3)(A), a question left op...
24-5438
Michael Bowe v. United States
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1), “[a] claim presented in a second or successive habeas corpus application under section 2254 that was presented in a prior application shall be dismissed.” (emphasis added). The first question presented is: Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1) applies to a claim presented in a second or succes...
25-1083
Markwayne Mullin, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, et al. v. Dahlia Doe, et al.
CONSIDERATION OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY (25A952) PRESENTED TO JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR AND BY HER REFERRED TO THE COURT IS DEFERRED. CONSIDERATION OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY (25A999) PRESENTED TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND BY HIM REFERRED TO THE COURT IS ALSO DEFERRED. THE APPLICATIONS ARE ALSO TREATED AS PETITIONS FOR A WRI...
25-1084
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Fritz Emmanuel Lesly Miot, et al.
CONSIDERATION OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY (25A952) PRESENTED TO JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR AND BY HER REFERRED TO THE COURT IS DEFERRED. CONSIDERATION OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY (25A999) PRESENTED TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND BY HIM REFERRED TO THE COURT IS ALSO DEFERRED. THE APPLICATIONS ARE ALSO TREATED AS PETITIONS FOR A WRI...
24-889
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., et al.
When a generic drug label fully carves out a patented use, are allegations that the generic drugmaker calls its product a "generic version" and cites public information about the branded drug (e.g., sales) enough to plead induced infringement of the patented use? 2. Does a complaint state a claim for induced infring...
24-856
Cisco Systems, Inc., et al. v. Doe I, et al.
Whether the Alien Tort Statute ("ATS"), 28 U.S.C. § 1350, allows a judicially-implied private right of action for aiding and abetting. 2. Whether, if ATS aiding-and-abetting claims are cognizable, mere knowledge rather than purpose suffices to show the requisite mens rea. 3. Whether the Torture Victim Protection Act...