Plain-English summary
Court unanimously upholds standard for calculating employers’ withdrawal liability from underfunded multiemployer plans
The Court unanimously affirmed that ERISA does not require plans to use a single, fixed set of actuarial assumptions when calculating a withdrawing employer’s share of an underfunded multiemployer pension plan. Plans may use reasonable methods and assumptions provided by statute and regulation.
Why this matters
This decision affects how much money a withdrawing employer may owe when it leaves an underfunded multiemployer pension plan. By allowing plans to use reasonable actuarial assumptions rather than forcing a rigid, one-size-fits-all approach, the ruling preserves plan flexibility in measuring underfunding and helps plans address long-term funding uncertainties.
Who may feel it
- Employers participating in multiemployer pension plans
- Employees and retirees whose benefits depend on multiemployer plans
- Multiemployer pension plan trustees and administrators
- Labor unions involved in multiemployer bargaining
- Pension actuaries and benefit consultants
Key questions
- Does ERISA require multiemployer pension plans to fix a single set of actuarial assumptions when calculating an employer’s withdrawal liability?