Plain-English summary
Court unanimously affirms how ERISA lets funds use actuarial assumptions to calculate withdrawal liability
The Court unanimously held that ERISA does not require pension funds to use actuarial assumptions that reflect the withdrawing employer’s particular circumstances when calculating withdrawal liability for underfunded multiemployer plans. The decision affirms the D.C. Circuit and lets plans rely on standard actuarial projections.
Why this matters
The ruling clarifies how much a departing employer can be required to pay and preserves a standard, plan-wide method for measuring underfunding. That reduces uncertainty for pension plans and participating employers and affects the financial obligations employers face when they leave multiemployer plans.
Who may feel it
- Employers participating in multiemployer pension plans
- Trustees and administrators of multiemployer pension plans
- Union-represented employees covered by multiemployer plans
- Actuaries and pension consultants
- Labor unions and benefit funds that manage underfunded plans