Plain-English summary
Court unanimously says FCC acted reasonably in changing several media-ownership rules
The Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Third Circuit and held that the FCC’s 2017 decision to repeal or modify three media-ownership rules was not arbitrary or capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. The Court found the agency gave adequate reasons when it relaxed longstanding restrictions on how many broadcast outlets one company may own in a market.
Why this matters
This case determines how much deference courts will give to the FCC when it updates media‑ownership rules in response to changed technology and marketplace conditions. It affects who can own local TV, radio, and newspapers, which in turn shapes local news coverage, the diversity of viewpoints available to the public, and competition in local advertising markets.
Who may feel it
- Local TV and radio broadcasters and station owners
- Newspaper publishers and media companies
- Local advertisers and competitors in broadcast markets
- Local news consumers and advocacy groups focused on media diversity
- Regulatory and administrative law practitioners