Plain-English summary
Court rules Alaska Native corporations are included in ISDEAA’s definition of 'Indian tribe'
The Supreme Court held that Alaska Native village and regional corporations formed under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) can qualify as “Indian tribes” under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA). The Court reversed the D.C. Circuit and remanded the cases for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Why this matters
The ruling determines which entities can enter contracts with the federal government under ISDEAA to manage and deliver federal services for Indian communities. Recognizing ANCSA corporations as tribes for ISDEAA purposes expands access to federal self-determination contracts and funding pathways for Alaska Native organizations and affects how agencies treat these corporations in program administration.
Who may feel it
- Alaska Native village and regional corporations formed under ANCSA
- Federally recognized tribes and tribal organizations
- Federal agencies that administer ISDEAA programs
- Alaska Native individuals and communities relying on tribal services
- States and local governments interacting with tribal contractors
Key questions
- Does the ISDEAA’s definition of “Indian tribe” include Alaska Native village and regional or village corporations created under ANCSA?