Plain-English summary
To decide how to calculate employer 'withdrawal liability' from multiemployer pension plans
The Court will decide how to calculate an employer’s withdrawal liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) when an employer leaves an underfunded multiemployer pension plan. The case asks whether certain projection methods and assumptions used to measure a plan’s underfunding are permitted under ERISA.
Why this matters
The decision will affect how much employers can be forced to pay when they leave multiemployer pension plans and could influence the stability and funding rules for thousands of union pension funds. A ruling for employers could limit trustees’ discretion and reduce assessed withdrawal bills; a ruling for trustees could preserve broad flexibility in choosing actuarial methods and assumptions.
Who may feel it
- Employers participating in multiemployer pension plans
- Unionized workers covered by multiemployer pension plans
- Pension plan trustees and administrators
- Actuaries and pension consultants
- Pension regulators and taxpayers (indirectly)
Key questions
- What legal standard governs which projection methods and assumptions trustees may use when calculating a plan’s underfunding for withdrawal liability under ERISA?